Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María Martha Fernández

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 09:01, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] María Martha Fernández

This article seams to be a vanity page. Not only there are no academic references in the net, but the achievemnts stated in the article seam to be to weak to keep this article in the Wikipedia. The article had an (defunct) Votes for Deletion page (see:Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/María Martha Fernández), that was closed because it didn't follow the procedures that currently apply for such purpose, so users are invited to vote again here. Mariano(t/c) 11:20, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Doesn't seem to make the grade for WP:BIO regarding authors. Kevin 13:10, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, have absolutely no idea who she is. No references to probe her notability. -- ReyBrujo 15:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, I read over and over her CV, which is the only site that I found about her, and I don't think she is notable for a wikipedia article. To me, she just looks like any other professor that publishes papers and essays. Copied from previous AfD. Gadig 15:45, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, I created this article with all my caress, but "Mariano" seems to be fighting a war. I can't fight any more, then. Delete my article. IgnatiusReilly 8:15, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment, her notability hasn't been established correctly. Fails WP:PROFTEST: she isn't more noteworthy than the average school professor. -- ReyBrujo 15:34, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
Comment: I'm sorry to hear you feel I personally attack you, but all I did was to set an AvD tag to this article, and that with a good reason. We will see if it will stay or not. Mariano(t/c) 16:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per Gadig. I can understand why IgnatiusReilly is disappointed, but this article does not make the grade for notability as per WP:NN. --BrownHairedGirl (talk • contribs) 15:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.