Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mapulane Surnames

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as copyright violation. I went to look for sources for the Kerrrzappp!, and found copyright violations instead. The two articles listed are in fact straight copies and pastes of entire copyrighted non-GFDL web pages on this Geocities web site. Uncle G (talk) 15:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mapulane Surnames

Mapulane Surnames (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Mapulana (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A list without context or much in the way of explanation, written in first-person and having a GeoCities page as the only reference. Prod removed by anon (most likely author). JuJube (talk) 12:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete The article is unencyclopedic. Masterpiece2000 (talk) 13:35, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Note Author has twice already removed the AfD notice from the article. JuJube (talk) 13:40, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
• Additional Note have added the article Mapulana as author is the main contributor to that one and it is related. JuJube (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I suggest removing it again. Mapulana is a documented community in South Africa. The article may be written in the first person, essay-style, rhetoric-filled, and generally bad. But a quick Kerrrzappp! using some sources would clear that right up. It is probably best to deal with the originally nominated article on its own. Uncle G (talk) 15:10, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.