Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manurewa Central School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:48, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manurewa Central School

Non notable school with nearly 0 information about it. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 07:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Delete as empty, but someone had to know some wiki to make the template. Looking for expansion within a few days. TKE 07:34, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. It has info in it, but it is still a stub. Keep given WP:SCHOOL (even if you disagree (as I do) with it you still should follow it here and then argue against the rule). --Midnighttonight 10:01, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per uniform outcome of past school nominations. Monicasdude 13:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Umm, isn't it preferable to merge non-notable schools into groups by district? JeffBurdges 16:40, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Well, I'd agree with you but most people who still bother commenting on schools for deletion don't agree. Average Earthman 18:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Found official website and added it to article while considering this afd. We have many schools with their own articles. This is a stub of this school, but still worthy its own article. Kukini 16:51, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep in good shape now. Osomec 19:21, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
  • I'd dissent with your definition of "good shape". I'd personally suggest this level of information would be better off merged either with the local geographic area or local schools. Average Earthman 04:06, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as a school.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Osomec. Arbusto 02:16, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is a pathetic excuse for an article, about a subject of marginal relevance at best. This article demonstrates precisely why elementary schools should not have carte blanche at the Wikipedia dining table. Denni ☯ 03:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Consider completing your own articles properly before insulting the work of others. --Rob 03:12, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per all above Jcuk 08:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Nice start to the article and should expand significantly in the future. Probably just as meaningful and already as long as Kapoot Clown Theater, not that I would ever call that a pathetic excuse for an article. -- JJay 19:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Moe ε 02:15, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
• KEEP thats my old school —This unsigned comment was added by 222.153.42.186 (talk • contribs) .
• Keep based on well established precedent. --Rob 03:11, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.