Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manorlane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as a copyvio (CSD G12). WjBscribe 02:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Manorlane

Manorlane (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Article is WP:SPAM, as it is commercial in nature - contravenes WP:NOT#Wikipedia_is_not_a_directory, wikipedia is not a directory for conducting business. I found this page due to edits to biogas (diff) User A1 (talk) 23:15, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

comment - A bot found that this page is actually a copyright violation. See User_Talk:Ecr33. User A1 (talk) 23:17, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete as copyvio. The page is all taken from the different sections of http://www.manorlane.co.uk/ DarkAudit (talk) 00:25, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio has been answered on discusion page, but this only supports the argument for deletion as spam. --BrucePodger (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Unsigned statement claiming that it's not a copyright violation is not sufficient. It is still a copyvio. DarkAudit (talk) 01:01, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.