Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manohar-Swaminathan Hypothesis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:05, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manohar-Swaminathan Hypothesis

this article is nonsense, and does not describe a real hypothesis. EsonLinji 07:04, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete hoax -- Samir (the scope) धर्म 07:06, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Bad-joke-ise - it's actually quite amusing. Metamagician3000 07:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Universal Law of Bad Breath? I'm not sure if this should go to Bad Jokes or be deleted, but it's quite obvious it shouldn't remain as an article as such. Darquis 08:31, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy BJAODN, this is funny, but the longer it remains undeleted the more bad breath it generates. Kimchi.sg 08:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nonsense. — TheKMan^talk 20:22, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:BALLS, but BJAODN if people are laughing --Deville (Talk) 03:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 16:30, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.