Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannerpunk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was move to Mannerpunk. I know you meant well, Cyde, but next time please don't remove the AfD notice until the discussion is closed. Thanks. howcheng {chat} 17:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mannerpunk

No sources so let's delete! Piecraft 16:59, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Nomination was orphaned, listing now. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 17:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Agreed, same as the other entries. UltimateXiphias 23:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• I suggest a move to fantasy of manners, which appears to be the more standard term, with "mannerpunk" treated as a (perhaps tongue-in-cheek?) variant. A source for the original coinage would also be a good addition. --redfox 20:37, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
• Strong Keep Rename per my dear friend redfox. Hey kiddo. This is clearly a bad-faith revenge AfD by the author of all the other x-punk articles. rodii 20:45, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

NO NO NO, please as I echo my fellow editors, don't take this as a personal attack! I am merely pointing out the flaw in this article. Piecraft 21:43, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Rename per the above, although coming up with outside lists of what is and isn't part of the genre (as in Redfox's link) wouldn't be amiss. Snarkout 00:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. 82.155.22.2 02:24, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as this is bullshit to list these alongsite the punkcruft. Deleting it would be throwing out the baby with the bathwater.... Jamie ^{(talk/contribs)} 03:08, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to what? rodii 03:17, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, and huh?. I started this; it appeared on a list of requested articles. It cites the source of the original name mannerpunk in-text; is that no longer good enough? Smerdis of Tlön 05:30, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Rename as per the above. Avogadro94 06:26, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and Rename as per above. This one seems legit, but "Fantasy of Manners" appears to be a slightly more general term than "Mannerpunk". (feel free to disagree and give your reasoning, naturally!) Listing was clearly retaliation for my listing of all the unused neologism -punk genres. —Matthew Brown (T:C) 21:57, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
• Comment - The page has been moved to Fantasy of manners, but it still needs some cleaning up (i.e. it still refers to "Mannerpunk" in some places). --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 22:00, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.