Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannequinism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:18, 15 September 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Mannequinism
neologism and/or nonsense BrainyBroad 07:47, September 6, 2005 (UTC)
- delete neologism. —brighterorange (talk) 16:53, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Confused manifesto. Delete. It's even too new to be a dicdef. JFW | T@lk 21:11, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. "too new a phenomenon to be included in Webster's or the Oxford English Dictionary"... or Wikipedia. -- BD2412 talk 23:02, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I think it's a cute word, not a neologism, but being a word which doesn't yet have dictionary entry is not a qualification for requiring an encyclopedia article!---CH (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It already has 307 search results at Google, and I came here to find the deffination of the word (used by one of my teachers), because it was not in Webster's. ---Nero_Nuri 23:06, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
