Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Dakota 02:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa

Mannaraprayil Cor-Episcopa (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

This person does not pass WP:BIO at all AW 08:05, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 19:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep Article needs sources, not deletion --Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 19:36, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete They need one or the other. •Elomis• 03:42, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, W.marsh 00:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Treat this as a keep if any reliable sources are added. -Amarkov blahedits 02:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment I added two sources, there wasn't much to find online. Just a few things related to his birth/bio and his current church position. Not much to chose from and/or read :-/ Missvain 04:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. No indication of notability, no reliable sources. Just a priest with a successful ecclesiastical career, apparently, but that would not be notable even if it were well sourced. Sandstein 07:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. You can give this article as much sources as you want, but the person in question is not notable. Sr13 09:12, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No notability - not that successful career, at least that can be verified. SkierRMH,11:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails WP:BIO claims one book published on the subject(no ISBN number mentioned), but not by an independant source. has WP:NPOV problems though fixable, WP:V lacks referencing that could address some of these issues. Subject lacks notiability. Gnangarra 15:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak delete. I'm not familiar with the polity of this church, but they appear to be an episcopal body. As such one of their bishops would probably be notable, but this priest misses. -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:21, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very strong Keep- Highly notable priest in Kerala. Nileena joseph (Talk|Contribs) 13:10, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
comment please support your claim with references, as I was unable to find anything that complied with WP:BIO to demostrate notiability. Gnangarra 13:37, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment: The article indicates some notability but is too verbose and very POV ("All these incidents never de-motivated Achen. Day by day he gained more courage and fought against the other group.") I don't think deletion should be taken as a precedent against recreation; I might possibly support a clear, concise and better referenced article. Uppland 17:51, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Abstain: This article is one of those that's so hard to read and one of those that haven't been fixed up yet, so I don't even know if he's notable or not. Looks to be deleted anyway though. --Wizardman 18:07, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.