Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manipulation of geological data

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:16, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manipulation of geological data

I looked at this page for a while tying to determine whether anything in it is salvagable. Actually, all the verifiable material is already at flood geology. Otherwise, this article is a creationist POV-fork of geology (assuming that there are only two perspectives: Old Earth and Young Earth which are clearly creationist idealizations). The article doesn't deserve saving and no one is going to search for such a title. --ScienceApologist 07:32, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per ScienceApologist. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-01-11 08:14Z
• Delete per ScienceApologist. Salsb 12:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete creationismcruft Cyde Weys _vote^talk 14:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 14:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Reyk 19:44, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -- an article with this title is unlikely to become NPOV any time soon. N Shar 00:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:25, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.