Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manipe F1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Enochlau 01:45, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Manipe F1

Non-notable site being spammed on various formula 1 articles. violet/riga (t) 20:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete violet/riga (t) 20:13, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Does having an eye-shattering color scheme make it a candidate for speedy deletion? Delete, in any case. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-05 20:15:44Z
    • Unfortunately, no. Delete with all reasonable haste, and remove linkspamming. Saberwyn 22:49, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
  • What defines a "Non-notable site"? Maybe sounding defensive, but even Wiki started small. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.71.83.72 (talk • contribs)
No, that's a very fair question! See WP:WEB for more information about what some believe to be reasonable criteria for website notability. Note that it's only a proposed guideline, but many of the general ideas it encodes seem to be frequently used in deletion discussions. —HorsePunchKid→龜 2005-12-07 01:57:18Z
  • I can't argue, obviously a little too early. Delete away. Manipe 21:22, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
    • That nice attitude makes me feel bad for nominating it now. :( violet/riga (t) 21:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Well, I'm new and I have to learn someway. Manipe 21:37, 8 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Although, I do have one question. Spamming? Manipe 16:51, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
        • That was a little harsh, perhaps, as you only added the link to a few articles. violet/riga (t) 17:31, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
        • Still not allowed I guess Manipe 22:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
  • No? Manipe 00:17, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.