Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manhattan Construction Company

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep as nomination was withdrawn. Ezeu 09:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Manhattan Construction Company

I tried to clean this up. Creator seems content to continue adding corporate addresses and phone numbers, essentially commercial spam. I tried to help them but want to keep the spam up so Delete Montco 03:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

• OK per the early returns, I withdraw my request to delete.Keep —Preceding unsigned comment added by Montco (talk • contribs)
• Keep. I sympathize with the nominator, but if this company did indeed build some important buildings, it is probable wp-worthy. Delete the spam, warn the spammers, but keep the article. Bucketsofg 03:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree that they are notable and I would under other circumstances have no problem. If they are going to keep going in and adding spam to the article and erase the work I tried to do in terms of agetting rid of the all caps entries and the addresses what can you do? I'll leave it to someone else to cleanup if the decision is to keep.

• Keep because the subject is valid. Quality control should not be done by just one person - we're into collective responsibility here! Therefore I have added it to my watchlist and if it is kept I will try to help keep it clean of corporate addresses and phone numbers. Ziggurat 03:39, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong 04:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable. Oscar Arias 05:08, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. --Allen 06:03, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep notable.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 07:38, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Nominator has withdrawn, no other delete votes. Can we get a speedy keep and early close, please? -- Saberwyn 07:51, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.