Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manaism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:10, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Manaism

Manaism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

I'm not sure if this is real. Looks dubious. Alksub (talk) 21:50, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete for having no reliable sources, appearing to have been made up one day. When google hit #1 is a stub article on Wikipedia, it's a good bet that the topic lacks notability, too. - Chardish (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. If this is a hoax then it's a pretty elaborate one. The hoaxers must have gone to the trouble to publish 154 books and 31 scholarly articles over the last 90 years. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:48, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per the sources cited by Phil Bridger. The The American Journal of Psychology article alone is quite convincing.--Kubigula (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.