Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managesturbation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Author requested deletion. Mak (talk) 03:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Managesturbation

Protologism, original research: Google shows no hits at all. -- The Anome 20:49, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable, albeit amusing, neologism. Mak (talk) 20:58, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Question: What, exactly, would one do to show that this is not a neologism / is acceptable for wikipedia? The article has already been expanded to differentiate from management-speak / business speak, and included external links. --Briantemple 21:11, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
    • Can you show us a single example of the word being used anywhere? BigDT 21:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lack of google hits screams Neologism. Nothing can change that. Fan1967 21:20, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - "I wager eleventy billion dollars". "That's not even a real number". "Yet". Unfortunately, WP is not the place for it to become a real number. BigDT 21:56, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete possibly speedy, per nom. Dictionary-like, and not factual.--Andeh 22:13, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - original research. - Richardcavell 23:03, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Deleted page per this discussion.--67.190.190.226 02:25, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Apologies. Was not logged in.--Briantemple 02:26, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Removed content but page is still present. Somebody with the power, please delete page.--Briantemple 02:34, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.