Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Managerzone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Managerzone

Managerzone (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Prod reason was Fails WP:WEB, no assertions of notability. I seconded the prod, with the reasoning: There is no independent coverage shown, only a press release. Prod was contested with the comment Talk page rationale already exists. However, the discussion there seems to relate to a db-advert speedy attempt. Now I think we all agree that this isn't blatant advertising, that's not the issue here. The issue is WP:Notability. Marasmusine 09:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Marasmusine 09:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Fails WP:WEB and provides no WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 13:07, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless sources giving coverage are found Corpx 19:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Keep. Although I admit fully the article is sans resources, I still think the subject matter is notable. I dislike the way it is being challenged using the clinical list of notability arguments. I think if we all tried to write an encyclopoedia instead of micromanaging to the maximum we would all do better. Erath 17:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete no independent reliable sources cover this, which means the article could never become a good one - even if everyone tries to write an encyclopaedia in the broad sense as Erath means. User:Krator (t c) 12:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.