Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Management Skills
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Management Skills
Appears to be the management philosophy of a "Robert L. Katz" who is described as a management expert. However there is no explanation as to why this person or his philosophy is notable. Doesn't appear to need to be covered by Wikipedia. WjBscribe 00:24, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- This appears to be an essay. Delete accordingly - we're not an essay repository. --Dennisthe2 00:32, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, is written as original research, and there is no evidence that Katz's philosophy is notable or widely applied. Trebor 01:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOR, this is just a badly wikified essay. meshach 03:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above. Also, Management and its various sub-subjects (Senior management, etc.) cover management philosophy. The author (Ghulam Ali) added a link to his userpage at the bottom, but this user does not cite where s/he got Katz's ideas in the first place. Cedlaod 04:12, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete OR. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C 05:16, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I'd hesitate to call this original research; what strikes me about most of these "management philosophies" is the blinding obviousness of their supposed insights. It's still an essay, and complete bollocks. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- You rock, dude. Of course you get extra points for the Borges ref. Keep up the good work. Wile E. Heresiarch 10:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. This sort of article should be put in a book called Management Skills for Dumbies (No Offense intended.) :^) §†SupaSoldier†§ 19:43, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see any indication of WP:V verifiable sources (or any sources actually.) --PigmanTalk to me 19:48, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and as original research. Inkpaduta 21:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per Smerdis. Wile E. Heresiarch 10:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete can an admin close this AfD per WP:SNOWBALL? 22:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.