Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man hour

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 20:22, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Man hour

Non-encyclopedic, in my opinion. Delete. --WikiFan04^{ß 11:41, 16 Jun 2005 (CDT)}

• Keep and cleanup, good subject written in an odd non-serious manner. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:41, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup - WP needs an article on man hour. We should thank 64.219.62.35 for taking time out of his, obviously, busy schedule to write it. -Acjelen 18:53, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep valid topic. - Mgm|^(talk) 19:17, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep valid article, but could use some of the wackyness removing. Is there a {{wacky}} template? -Splash 20:31, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Encyclopedic topic. How about {{Cleanup-tone}}? DoubleBlue (Talk) 21:22, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Keepand cleanup: widely used measure of work. --Ragib 22:41, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Notable form of measurement. Capitalistroadster 01:58, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Valuable topic. Pburka 02:18, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup as per above. -- Jonel | Speak 03:28, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep like everyone else says, expand. SchmuckyTheCat 04:20, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and cleanup. Obviously notable economic measure. Xoloz 04:41, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.