Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mama Jama
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 12:18Z
[edit] Mama Jama
Tagged as WP:CSD#A7 but notability is asserted. Assertion is weak and references lacking. Guy (Help!) 22:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weakest Keep Assertion of notability is substantiated by reviews on their webspace dating back to 1988, but these are not verifiable. No Allmusic.com entry, no major indie label (CD Baby will sell anything), no verifiable notability claims. On the upside, the non-verifiable reviews on their webspace date back to 1988, and they do seem to have a steady touring gig. Flakeloaf 23:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete I would like to see proof of the Washington Post article, and that they tour steadily.-MsHyde 23:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 01:22, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't believe Washington Post review is fabricated, as it does state an author's name/date [1]; however, the remaining "reviews" are trivial. I don't see a "touring" schedule, only 4 gigs scheduled so far between now and next August, given - it is early in the year of course. [2]As interesting as this band seems, I don't see clear evidence of notability per WP:Music so far. Cricket02 02:52, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 15:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
