Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malouf Abraham, Jr.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 17:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Malouf Abraham, Jr.

Malouf Abraham, Jr. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Successful allergist who knows a bunch of important people, apparently. Otherwise non-notable. Dhartung | Talk 18:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep At least these 2 references serve to establish notability: [1] and [2]. Mr.Z-mantalk¢ 18:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete those two references are nothing of the sort; one is an obvious reprint of a press release from a trivial source, and the other is "he bought a painting". Aside from the art gallery - which, with all due respect, isn't exactly the Guggenheim - there is nothing in this article to indicate that he has done anything more than any other doctor. - iridescenti (talk to me!) 00:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Do you really believe that? Have you read the article? Billy Hathorn 05:06, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as art collectors go, he is of trivial importance: There would be real coverage in the art publications if he were of any significance. As a physician, he has promoted a homeopathic remedy. The sourcing requirements for N are intended to be used together with common sense. If kept, it can of course be stubbified, as can most articles from the same editor. 01:27, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Keep Is an art collector expanding his museum by $7 million "of trivial importance"? Dr. Abraham easily qualifies for notability.

Billy Hathorn 05:03, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep. We can debate his importance, but there are valid sources cited and he does therefore appear to meet the notability guidelines. That being said, the article could use some trimming and balancing.--Kubigula (talk) 03:08, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.