This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 23:08, Mar 30, 2005 (UTC)
Lucky 6.9 marked it as a speedy, but I think it qualifies more of as band vanity if it were to be deleted, so I'm putting this through VFD. - Mailer Diablo 06:50, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete, not notable, band vanity. Megan1967 07:54, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Delete not notable. Cute band name, though. Jonathunder 09:28, 2005 Mar 19 (UTC)
Agree the name's cute, but the article's gotta go one way or the other. Delete. - Lucky 6.9 06:00, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.