Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malbot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If anyone really wants to create a redirect as Revolving Bugbear suggests, go for it. Neıl ☎ 13:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Malbot

Malbot (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Original research and unsourced. There are 2200 pages on Google that even reference this short word. Some of them are simply of people with the nickname "Malbot", and others are pages that mirror this article. This article has been out since 2006 and yet it is obvious that this word either is not widespread or worse, does not exist. Althena (talk) 21:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 00:07, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  • I hate to say it, but I may agree. I think it is informative on its on, but it seems to be written as a definition, rather than an article. --Revanche (talk) 01:21, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - per lack of coverage in any media (news and blogs) and per WP:NEO. Burzmali (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Internet bot. No reason to fork this from the main article. - Revolving Bugbear 20:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
    • But is there a reason for it to exist at all, even as a redirect? It really seems to be a made-up word. Althena (talk) 06:38, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.