Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makaveli Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Tupac Shakur. - Yomangani^talk 15:07, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Makaveli Records

It is about a company that would have been created if we were in a differnt universe - Wiki in not a crystal ball ArmadilloFromHell 05:26, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect to Tupac Shakur. Everything that needs to be said about this is already mentioned in Tupac's article. Resolute 06:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Useless article, doesn't really provide any relevant information.--MonkBirdDuke 07:59, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Resolute. It might be the subject of some searches, but everything can be found in the Tupac article. -newkai t-c 11:45, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Tupac Shakur, a label that signed only one artist doesn't satisfy WP:MUSIC for its own article.-- danntm ^T _C 17:30, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Just continue to work on it, a lot of article start out like this. It's just an initial stub. How can you not have a page about a label one of Hip-Hop's most known artist was going to start? There is a whole theory that points to Suge Knight killing Tupac Shakur because he was going to leave Death Row to start this label. —Preceding unsigned comment added by License2Kill (talk • contribs)

Comment Because this record company really was not started up, everything there is to say is mentioned in Tupac's article, and the theory that Suge killed Tupac is not verifiable, therefore not relevent to this article. Resolute 03:57, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. it doesn't exist, the plans may have existed, and if so they should be in the Tupac Shakur article.--Buridan 17:03, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect per Resolute. A record label that was never functional. Prolog 04:19, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.