The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was slowly speedy delete. Note that there's only one vote here, so if there were an actual claim of notability, I'd be relisting. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 18:14, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Unfortunately with no relevant google hits [1] and no sources cited, the claim to being well-known is unverifiable. Seems very unlikely to pass WP:BIO in any event. Kappa 16:31, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
Delete, very near being an {{nn-bio}} candidate. Punkmorten 21:44, 20 November 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.