Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahjong slang

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 02:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Mahjong slang

Mahjong slang (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, so articles on slang have very limited use. The article has be copied to Wikidictionary already. The page is specific to the Hong Kong area, isn't in English, and doesn't cite any sources that could be used to expand it. Editors have had several months to correct these problems since the article was tagged. Gimme danger 21:08, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - It looks and smells like cruft. Considering the fact that is has been crosswikied to wikitionary, I don't see any problem deleting. --Tλε Rαnδom Eδιτor (ταlκ) 21:34, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this please, Wikipedia is not a slang or idiom guide. Cruftbane 22:30, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletions. -- Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 22:43, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP is not a dictionary in WP:NOT, especially not one for slang Corpx 02:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 04:00, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, this is not a dictionary. Hydrogen Iodide 05:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above; listcruft. Bearian 13:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.