Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnum Opus (brand)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:44, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Magnum Opus (brand), Kaleidoscope (magazine), Opus (company)

Non-notable fashion label associated with non-notable company. Product isn't even available yet. Prod removed by third party whose only edit was to remove it. --Merope 12:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC) I am also listing the following related articles for deletion for advertising a non-notable company and product:

  • Kaleidoscope (magazine)
  • Opus (company)
--Merope 12:40, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

(Denneval) So wouldn't this justify the removal of Windows Vista? I mean, I understand that Wikipedia is NOT a "crystal ball"; Opus exists. I just don't understand the reasoning behind deletion of this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denneval (talk • contribs)

Windows is an established company with constant press attention--it thus satisfies WP policies concerning companies. A product still in development by one of the largest corportations in the world is in itself notable, even if it is never released. The argument concerning your company isn't just that the product doesn't exist yet, but that the company has received no attention (that I can tell) from verifiable and reliable sources. If I am wrong, please provide evidence of this by editing the article. -- Merope 20:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

(Denneval) So a company with no media attention is therefore not a candidate for a Wikipedia article? In the real world, this is called "prejudice". I'm so sorry that 24 kb is hogging up bandwidth from the online servers. Thank God Windows didn't have access to a Wiki in the 80s or they'd be nowhere today.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.