Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magie Dominic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. - Bobet 18:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Magie Dominic

A cut-and-paste job from the poet's own website. Does not conform to W:MOS. Victoriagirl 04:19, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per CSD-A8 - copyvio of [1] posted in the past 48 hours. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 06:24, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per Coredesat. Alphachimp ^talk 07:06, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The article is no longer a copyvio. It is, however, a stub. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 08:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak delete. The copyvio is gone, so this isn't a speedy candidate, but she still doesn't seem to be notable. Her book has an Amazon sales rank of 1,512,470 (550,358 on Amazon.ca). --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Reworking to excise the copyvio has resulted in multiple writing credits and a section with award nominations, which both help establish notability, being cut [2]. I would consider a Foreword finalist notable. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - no assertion of notability. --WinHunter ^(talk) 11:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - now that it is a copyvio. It needs some expansion though. --Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 15:22, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• keep First, stop comparingg sales on Amazon, There are many other Canadian online bookstores and I stopped using them for my publishing company years ago. When I found the misplaced article in the Canadian Poets Category, I removed the whole thing and cleaned it up and put it in its own article. I was unaware of her own website Bio and tried to make it more neutral less vanity as I could. She seems to have some notability in Canada as she is a member of the prestigious League of Canadian Poets of which I and most Canadians know is hard to join. So my vote is KEEP WayneRay 16:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)WayneRay
• Weak keepWhilst I am not certain of notability, I am prepared to give the article a chance and WP:AGF. -- Alias Flood 16:14, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep The article, as nominated, has now all but disappeared. Unfortunately, what is left is something that, at best, can be decribed as bare bones. While I disagree that the League of Canadian Poets is a difficult organization to join - and, therefore question the relevance - I am noow of the opinion that the article should be given a chance.--Victoriagirl 16:41, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete can't see this being notable. I don't think we should keep articles on the basis that they may possibly be notable in the future. michaelCurtis ^talk+ _{contributions} 16:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Very weak Keep She certainly seems to be fairly notable in her field DavidHumphreys ^{SPEAK TO ME}ABOUT _{THE THINGS I MESSED UP}18:42, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, good stub. --Aguerriero (talk) 03:10, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.