Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maffitt Ledge

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Maffitt Ledge

Maffitt Ledge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

PROD bump. Rationale was non-notable. This is a real place, but is it important enough to have an article? Article says it is an island. This NOAA source says it is underwater at least part of the time, which fits the ledge name better. AFD Precedent is that major features are worth keeping. This has been named, and it wouldn't be hard to add geo-coordinate data to the article, but I'm not sure what to do. GRBerry 16:40, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as there are few sources and those only side mentions. It's probably only significant as a navigation hazard. --Dhartung | Talk 00:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No evidence of historical interest, notability as a hazard to navigation, etc., etc. If there's some sort of omnibus article on submerged rocks in Boston Harbor, it can be redirected there. Choess 09:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
• delete per aboveOo7565 17:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.