Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad vortex

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:24, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mad vortex

An article about Yet Another Blog (which features the work of "M. Edwards C," "I.M. Tremblay," and "Celia Pleete") written in a mostly nonsensical style by User:Celiapleete. "Mad vortex" gets 117 unique Google hits and 20 mentions total in Goog Blogs, not all of them about this site. Send this to Encyclopedia Dramatica, not here. Calton | Talk 02:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. I get an Alexa traffic ranking of "no data"[1] and a google link search of 4 sites[2] to YouTube and blogger.com.--Fuhghettaboutit 03:27, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - fails to assert notability. Feel free to speedy it after CSD A7 is expanded. MER-C 08:55, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete yes another blog that needs deleting... --Charlesknight 09:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Keep: because the Wikipedia nazis aren't making the internet a better place to research online, by ITS VERY NATURE OF DEMOCRATIC EDITING. I bet you all think you're high and mighty research teams, but the reality is, Wikipedia is a bloody joke. I refuse to let my students use it, and it took you months and months to find this article "unworthy", so how many others lurk in the dark? I'm off to better horizons, like ENCYCLOPEDIA DRAMATICA, home of the people with actual senses of humour! When I wiki your names, I'm filing you under THE NERD PATROL!—The preceding unsigned collective personal attack was added by 146.186.124.143 (talk • contribs) .

...home of the people with actual senses of humour! And no actual standards. Good luck, you'll probably find a fitting home, there. --Calton | Talk 01:52, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.