The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Contested prod. Concern was: "Neologism with no reliable independent sources; suggest deletion per WP:NEO / WP:NOT#OR." This term has no Google hits and no Google Scholar hits. The article has no reliable independent sources to substantiate its content or establish notable usage. --Muchness (talk) 16:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. JamesMLanetc 08:37, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.