Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MacArthur Study Bible

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep--JForget 00:15, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] MacArthur Study Bible

MacArthur Study Bible (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability, very promotional written tone, possibly G11 speedy material Rackabello 16:32, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

    • My concerns have been ameliorated. Rackabello 21:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. For the most part, the tone is more descriptive than promotional. As always it's a fine line between content that attempts to establish notability and content that could be perceived as promotional (e.g. noting the number of copies sold, that it won the Study Bible of the Year Award, etc.) Captain Zyrain 16:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I don't see this being promotional. It's a fairly clear and concise description of what it is, and establishes notability based on WP:BK for a major award. Yngvarr (t) (c) 16:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Written in a descriptive (not spammy) tone, well-sourced, asserts notability, and that assertion passes the notability guidelines for books. NASCAR Fan24(radio me!) 17:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, nommed version was more like a directory entry than promotional, but current version adequately asserts notability with sources. --Dhartung | Talk 19:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, it has been a lot improved since the nomination. I have never heard of it though. BASE101() 19:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, in regards to the initial concerns, however I wonder if this text is WP:NOTABLE in itself? Tiggerjay 01:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.