Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MUD Coffee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep; the argument and sources provided by User:JavaTenor are convincing. Having swung the discussion, perhaps JT will be so kind as to add them to the article?--Kubigula (talk) 05:58, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MUD Coffee
A local coffee shop that I don't quite think passes WP:CORP standards. It's notability is argued through being called the best coffee in the city by several reputable sources. So does having a few people call you the best cup of coffee equal notable per Wikipedia standards? I lean towards no. If this is kept, those sources need to be cleaned up; cite the independent sources and not the store's website. Metros (talk) 21:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, I don't see any reliable sources; this also borders on advertising. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 23:15, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - needs references cleanup as per above, but notable because of the wide positive reviews in this starbucks-riddled city. --ChrisRuvolo (t) 19:03, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete as spam. Fails WP:CORP and WP:RS. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:22, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per coverage in Fortune Small Business[1], the New York Times[2][3], and Bust (magazine)[4], among others. Seems sufficient to pass the primary criterion of WP:CORP to me. JavaTenor (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per coverage from reliable sources note by JavaTenor. -- Whpq (talk) 14:37, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.