Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MS Arosa Sun

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was KEEP. It was deleted as a copyvio. dbenbenn | talk 14:20, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] MS Arosa Sun

Basically the biography of a ship, now scrapped. Radiant! 12:38, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - we have thousands of ship articles, many of which are far more obscure than this one. I think I even have a picture of this vessel that I can upload, probably why I added to my watchlist. Stan 23:01, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Comment I think it can be a good beginning, but it will be hard work...If a picture is uploaded and some copyediting is performed (I tried to do it, but couldn't!), it will be a good stub to begin with. --Neigel von Teighen 23:05, 1 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems perfectly notable enough to be in Wikipedia.--Gene_poole 00:40, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Alas, 'tis a copyvio from several sources. Agree that a rewrite at the temp page would be a keep. BTW, how are you, Gene? Long time, dude! Drop me an e-mail when you have a moment. - Lucky 6.9 02:46, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Seems notable, though will need a rewrite if it is copyvio. Can you find the sources? DaveTheRed 03:03, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Sure can: [1]. That was just the first one.  :^) - Lucky 6.9 18:18, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Keep a rewrite - David Gerard 11:00, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.