Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ML Master Lists

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete - fails WP:WEB. Self-references are not considered reliable sources. KrakatoaKatie 05:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] ML Master Lists

ML Master Lists (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable website Christoph StSmith (talk) 09:37, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Speedy delete - doesn't assert notability. MER-C 09:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
    • The Wikipedia ML Master List is a brief description of the ML Master List concept, a reference for it was provided on September 21, 2006, tinyurl.com/2e3xoq.Jonathan00 (talk) 00:14, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JERRY talk contribs 03:10, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
delete. Doesn't pass WP:WEB, no references. — brighterorange (talk) 20:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
    • A reference for ML - Master Lists was already provided. ML- Master Lists is a form of web-specific content - its content is distributed solely on Internet - and is grouped under the Wesites category. Its notability is not temporary as the interest in the topic has been continual. The Wikipedia article would be able to develop other sections, for instance the article on Tinyurl.com. The Wikipedia article does not describes the nature, appearance or services a website offers, it describes the ML - Master Lists concept and, according to the Wikipedia policies, is more up-to-date than most reference sources, incorporating new developments and facts as they are made known. 75.93.8.231 (talk) 17:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC) — 75.93.8.231 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.