Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MEADA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 02:08, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
[edit] MEADA
An as yet unpublished magazine, sourced only to its own web site, that may eventually become notable. It's own site says "The first issue of MEADA Magazine will be available in Late July 2007." WP:CRYSTAL DES (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This magazine already has issue zero published. Obviously, all search engines and publishing organizations would have this information stored when it is automatically crawled or manually updated. The magazine is well known in the Middle East anyway.
- Delete as per my nom. DES (talk) 17:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I wanted to delete it at first, but I patched it up a bit to make it stub-worthy. I have a feeling it will just come back in some form or other anyway. Anakin101 18:09, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Non notable mag Corpx 18:20, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 02:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It may return someday, but if it does, it will then have some notability attached to it. Resolute 04:53, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete; google search indicates its not yet notable. I couldnt find an ISSN either.[1] John Vandenberg 05:04, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Lots of magazines are born and dead every day worldwide. If this one gets to be notable we will have the article in a few years. We don't have a crystal ball to now the future. Right now its simply free advertising, even if in good faith. - Nabla 13:42, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Delete until it becomes established. The web site announces that it "is set to be one of Middle East’s leading consumer’s Art, Design, and Architecture magazines. " but there's no reason for others to share their confidence. DGG 02:53, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.