Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Chorbles
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:04, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] MC Chorbles
This article has been deleted a few times already but it keeps coming back and I suspect that it will continue to, so let's have a discussion. Google search for "MC Chorbles" brings up 10 results; "Blake Fulcher" 7; Fulchorb 2. Claim to notability is that the song Hot Summer Love invited controversy by being a mash-up of Summer Love and Hot Summer Night, although I can't find any coverage of it (at least not by searching for Chorbles Timberlake or Fulcher Timberlake). I am also nominating the following related articles:
-
- Hot Summer Love (song)
- The Essence Of Chorb (album) ... discospinster talk 03:10, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Also adding, on advice of Chris:
-
- NiteRunner, a similarly elusive subject (see Google search of "NiteRunner Presents"). ... discospinster talk 14:15, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete and Salt as non notable band, A7. If it keeps coming back, it's probably the same author re-creating it. Undeath (talk) 03:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete and add NiteRunner to the list--part of the same series, and the only Ghits for "Needles & Haystacks" niterunner or the "aussie street hot 100" are Wikipedia. Shawisland (talk) 03:54, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete all, no reliable sources showing notability. NawlinWiki (talk) 09:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - not notable enough. iMatthew 2008 11:49, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Can I also add to this discussion and nominate for deletion M$C and NiteRunner, which are related articles by the same bloke, again which I feel fail WP:MUSIC, and which have already been deleted once and twice respectively. If people feel they should go separately I'll start a separate discussion, but as far as I'm concerned we should Delete all. Chris (talk) 08:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
