Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. Elizabeth Graue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Subject meers WP:PROF. Non-admin closure. --Boricuaeddie 17:25, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] M. Elizabeth Graue

M. Elizabeth Graue (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

University of Wisconsin professor. Unreferenced, fails WP:PROF. Eliz81^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:10, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

• Keep The article has two references which show the subject is a full professor at a major university, and has numerous articles in refereed journals and two scholarly books to her credit, which satisfies the test of WP:PROF which says "the academic is more notable than the average college instructor/professor."The "average college instructor/professor" who would have fewer publications and lack tenure. Edison 19:19, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 19:25, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep. Full professor, with 3 books to her name, albeit with what look like relatively minor publishers; Google Scholar reveals reasonable citation levels for two of them. One of her journal publications is also reasonably well cited. I can't unearth her CV, but Google Scholar (which usually seems to underestimate) came up with around 35 publications. I think the highly cited book/article probably just about swing meeting WP:PROF. Espresso Addict 04:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak keep She seems to have about 16 papers. the most cited have been cited 23, 16, and 11 times in Journal articles, according to Web of science--which is incomplete in this subject. Her books have been cited by journal articles 41 and 25 times. I do not really know the standards in this subject all that well, so I'm just reporting the information. I think it's borderline; given that it's a very good university, I've given her the benefit of the doubt and said Weak Keep. Full professor even at Wisconsin is not automatically notable, just almost always.

DGG (talk) 03:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.