Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M-learning

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. — JIP | Talk 07:07, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] M-learning

Looks like a lot of original research

• Delete; per nomination. -James Howard (talk/web) 15:07, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the link just under the image leads to a paper (on an external site), which is about the topic of the article. Did you miss it? This does not qualify as original research, then. As for notability, I have also found this article about the topic of the article, and I am going to add this and some other references to the article. Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 19:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Keep http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22M-learning%22 Hipocrite - «Talk» 19:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
• Training by means of PalmPilot? I'm thinking not. I'm an educator; I've seen no hint of this on the horizon; smells like original research to me. Delete. Denni☯ 06:02, 9 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment; in the Wikipedia, original research means WP:NOR:

The phrase "original research" in this context refers to untested theories; data, statements, concepts and ideas that have not been published in a reputable publication; or any new interpretation, analysis, or synthesis of published data, statements, concepts or ideas that, in the words of Wikipedia's founder Jimbo Wales, would amount to a "novel narrative or historical interpretation".

This article is not original research because it summarizes information from some papers published elsewhere. You can still vote delete for some other reason, of course.

One other observation (to the nominator, this time): adding an AfD tag is not a minor edit! [1] [2] Paolo Liberatore (Talk) 12:13, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.