Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynn Klock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nom withdrawn. Singularity 07:08, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Lynn Klock
Sounds like the résumé of a decent but not quite notable enough musician and teacher. The possible claims to notability lack independent sources. Sandstein 21:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC) Withdraw, the sources provided are (barely) enough for notability. Sandstein 05:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletions. —David Eppstein 23:50, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Notability not proven due to lack of sources. I originally tagged this for speedy deletion, and the article has not markedly improved since. Realkyhick 23:59, 12 August 2007 (UTC)- Change to keep. The New York Times review is enough to tilt the balance toward notability. Could still use another source citation or two, though. Realkyhick 03:14, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep "Professor of Saxophone at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst" is a sign of some distinction as a music educator; "Works written for Lynn Klock includd a work by recent Pulitzer Prize winner Lew Spratlan." is a sign of distinction as a musician. I think in combination they are enough. DGG (talk) 04:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps — if those statements could be verified. But there are no sources shown that verify this. Realkyhick 05:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Did you even try? First hit = source for both facts. —David Eppstein 05:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. But where are they in the article? Realkyhick 15:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- If you did run a search, why didn't you add it to the article when you first tagged it as insufficiently sourced? —David Eppstein 15:33, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I did. But where are they in the article? Realkyhick 15:04, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Did you even try? First hit = source for both facts. —David Eppstein 05:56, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Perhaps — if those statements could be verified. But there are no sources shown that verify this. Realkyhick 05:02, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete per lack of notability. Being of professor on a topic is not automatically notable and needs more sources to prove notability Corpx 06:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I added some more sources to the article, including a (not very positive) New York Times review that (together with another one that I found references to but didn't find an actual copy of) pass WP:MUSIC #1, I think. But I'm more impressed by his list of students, many of whom have gone on to be prominent educators themselves. —David Eppstein 17:03, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:SNOW. MrPrada 01:09, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
