Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lygodactylus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 18:49, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Lygodactylus

Lygodactylus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

List cruft of all red links. Masterpedia 04:39, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep - the german wiki has a good stub and I've copied some material across. Not sure why the nominator thinks a stub on a genus does not belong here. Expand this rather than delete - Peripitus (Talk) 05:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Sourceable, notable, expandable and encyclopedic. I think every species, much more so every genus, should be in WP.--killing sparrows 11:51, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, to my knowledge any species/family/genus or other biological classification group can be kept so long as its existence is verifiable, and that doesn't seem to be an issue here. Arkyan • (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Solid keep — Valid genus. Sorry, but to say this is list cruft seems like pure deletionist cynicism. — RJH (talk) 16:56, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong keep. Biological genera are noteworthy.--JyriL talk 16:59, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, duh. A genus of geckoes, with a fairly large number of redlinks for the species. Yes, this is pretty specialized, and it may be a while before someone with the requisite familiarity with geckoes comes by to fill them in, but I can't see deleting this for purely subjective reasons. I am suddenly moved with a hankering to own a Lygodactylus rex as a pet. - Smerdis of Tlön 19:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, although there is probably a better visual presentation of all those species. --Mus Musculus 05:21, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.