Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luther Jackson Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn SkierRMH (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Luther Jackson Middle School

Luther Jackson Middle School (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

non-notable middle school - merge and redirect to Fairfax County Public Schools Arthurrh (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - changed my decision after good sources were added showing notability. Arthurrh (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep This school has a significant history -- in fact, is an important part of the history of Fairfax County -- as shown in the History section I've just added. It now has multiple, independent, reliable sources and meets WP:N(just added), meeting the objection that the school is "non-notable". Noroton (talk) 02:18, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete per nom. I don't feel that the history is significant, but perhaps there is more than is mentioned in the article? If the article is expanded before the AfD closes please ping me on my talk page. CRGreathouse (t | c) 03:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Keep thanks to TerriersFan's expansion. CRGreathouse (t | c) 18:56, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Keep - this is an important school historically. For example "opened its doors in 1954 as Fairfax County's sole high school for black students" from here. Plenty of sources to meet WP:N, see also [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and so on. TerriersFan (talk) 05:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep A well-written article that provides multiple reliable and verifiable sources to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. Alansohn (talk) 05:20, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep some of them are going to have sources. AnteaterZot (talk) 05:25, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per all of the above.   jj137 ♠ Talk 00:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Important historic middle school, sources availible and cited. KeepOnTruckin ^{Complain to me | my work here} 01:37, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Comment - now that the nomination has been withdrawn and there are no remaining deleters, this can now procedurally be speedy closed. TerriersFan (talk) 04:38, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.