Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luminator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 01:12, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Luminator

Luminator (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No sources, no indication of notability; possibly a joke or prank? Makerowner 02:03, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

• Weak keep. I assume the source is the one hidden in the external links section, so it's not a joke. I can find a few other references to it, like this one and this one. Still borderline notability though. Croxley 02:55, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The only sources that mention a luminator are articles written by a Mark Macy. It is an exceptional claim with no reliable sources. Phony Saint 03:11, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. Someguy1221 09:15, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable, with strange sources. Virtual Cowboy 12:09, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:ATT and is at best questionable under WP:NOR. Without evidence that this is a notable paranormal device, it should not be kept. --EMS | Talk 19:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.