Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Field

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge into Pearl Harbor. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 00:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Luke Field

Not notable building even if its naval and in Pearl Harbor.

• Merge into somewhere where this will be more useful - like the main Pearl Harbor article. It deserves to be kept somewhere, but it's a little bit too nn for an article of its own. Grutness...wha? 00:54, 13 October 2005 (UTC)
• Merge per Grutness. It is too small to keep on its own when it can be placed elsewhere. Sonic Mew | talk to me 16:12, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.