Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Connell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Johnleemk | Talk 14:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Luke Connell

Notable why? The article says a lot about him but not what he's done that merits an article. CEO of MediaWeb but what's that? Google doesn't say much about him ([1] & [2]). Spondoolicks 19:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Joe 20:15, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Give the article time His article is interesting and I want to see what others may contribute to it.(UTC)
• Extra-Super-Flaky Weak Keep Oooh, I really want to vote delete for this one because it looks a lot like a vanity page, but the referenced articles are keeping me from pulling the trigger. --Bugwit grunt / scribbles 20:24, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable biography. Good for him for leaving school early and pursuing a career in business but he needs to achieve something notable in his chosen field before a WP article is justifiable. WP:BIO refers, also WP:VANITY and Wikipedia:Autobiography.  (aeropagitica)  23:31, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I read nothing to merit an entry. Not notable. feydey 13:01, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, weak/conditional keeps are a good sign that something is very wrong, and nobody wants to admit it. — Mar. 29, '06 [07:02] <freakofnur_xture|talk>

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.