Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luis Sera Resident Evil 4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 01:18, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Luis Sera Resident Evil 4

Luis Sera Resident Evil 4 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable video game character. Yngvarr (c) 09:09, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete: The material is overly detailed, in-universe, and does not demonstrate the notability or importance of the character outside the plot of Resident Evil 4. The subject is in my opinion better handled by Characters in Resident Evil 4#Luis Sera, which may be a suitable target for redirect with or without merge. -- saberwyn 10:57, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Merge- Although I love the game, the character doesn't need its own article. Some of the extensively detailed needs to be removed, but merging would help to better expand the character's section in Characters in Resident Evil 4. Mastrchf91 (t/c) 21:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Excessive detail and info that's is better presented in the list of characters. I don't believe anything needs to be merged as the list entry seems to be appropriate. Bill (talk|contribs) 15:28, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete A quick glimpse at the history of Characters in Resident Evil 4 shows the creator trying to add misc. in-universe details and getting reverted, probably the reason for this page's creation. The characters page could do with some expansion and additional sources, which there are, but what's really needed is some communication between editors. There's nothing really worth keeping, it's just retelling the game's plot. Sera is a character introduced and killed within the same game, he's hardly a major figure that will be covered in the detail needed for a separate article. Someoneanother 23:26, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.