Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Loulady

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Rx StrangeLove 20:43, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Loulady

Marked as a speedy due to no assertion of notability. However I think the first paragraph does assert nobility, although I have not checked to see how well known she actually is. The rest of the article is very poor, but I don't think this is quite speediable. Delete. Thryduulf 14:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy delete under WP:CSD A7, and so tagged. i don't see the mere statement that someone is a model as being a claim of noptabliity, and I don't see any other claim. This reads like a typical vanity/tribute article. If not speedied, delete unless cleaned up and significant additional evidence of notability provided. DES ^(talk) 16:20, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Comment - I originally added this page as a {{nn-bio}}. Thryduulf moved the page to VfD and then DESiegel readded the nn-bio tag, leaving the VfD tag intact.

To quote the guideline on criteria for speedy deletion

"An article about a real person that does not assert that person's importance or significance. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to VFD instead.". I feel that I correctly listed it under speedy deletion, but since it seems to be disputed by the user who created the page and Thryduulf, the article should remain in VfD, not speedy.

I would, however, like to give the newcomer a chance to move the article to their user namespace before deleting it, and a chance to respond to the message I left on the discussion page. I should note that the user LouLady is new, has not been welcomed yet, and may not be familiar with policies or aware of how and when to use the User namespace. I don't consider having your first article listed as a VfD to be a friendly welcome. --Aluion 17:04, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy under A7. I would have done it myself if it hadn't been listed here. Article in no way asserts notability. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 18:14, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy. Also would have done it myself if the AfD notice hadn't been there. android79 18:38, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, maybe speedy. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:26, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.