Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louisdale History (Grandique ferry)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 08:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Louisdale History (Grandique ferry)

Louisdale History (Grandique ferry) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Similar named page by the same author already deleted. Article is rambling and author has removed two Cleanup tags Malathos 04:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: I'm concerned about the copyright status of the articles' context, as the similarly named REAL HISTORY OF LOUISDALE had some copyright problems. Anyhow, I'm not sure this meets notability guidelines. - Rjd0060 05:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete I would have said keep if the article could have been renamed and cleaned up to our standards, but it seems that has already failed though. I would also do a serious investigation to see if this is not a straight copy-and-paste from another site, as it appears to be written in too much of an informal POV to be written by someone not related to the subject. Subject may or not be notable, FWIW. — Save_Us_229 05:19, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete per Save Us, could be a copyvio as noted.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:11, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• reverting to weak delete / rewrite: The author is trying to verify usage rights (see the AFD talk page) and I believe the article has been written in good faith; but the it remains a random collection of facts with no real structure. Recent attempts to flag the article for cleanup have been reverted and previous attempts seem to have similarly failed. Malathos 17:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

• delete / rewrite from scratch - Articles it stands is ungrammatical, unstructured nonsense and probably can't be salvaged, but there is such a place, and I'm sure it has enough history to merit an article. Upon further thought: If any of this info is salvageable, shouldn't it just be in the Louisdale, Nova Scotia article anyway? - Special-T (talk) 13:22, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.