Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lori Jareo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP (no consensus). TigerShark 18:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lori Jareo

• Delete. I believe the subject is not sufficiently notable to merit its own article in Wikipedia. — Mike (talk • contribs) 16:48, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nor is there any WP:RS to provide that information. Ste4k 20:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 21:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep if it can be sourced - as it is, it is unsourced. I don't question notability, though, from ghits. BigDT 01:18, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Another Hope, which covers everything important, and has media coverage links. Lot's of copied content as well. -LtNOWIS 06:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Author was part of a national news story due to her complete disregard of copyright. News mentions from National Public Radio, SciFi Wire, Publisher's Weekly, the Daytona Beach News-Journal, Comic Book Resources, Ansible, and blog mentions from professional authors here, here, here, and at StarWars.com. Easily meets WP:WEB and/or WP:BIO, take your pick. MikeWazowski 16:31, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Please consider adding those sources as appropriate to the article. The only problem I really see with it is that it is unsourced. BigDT 04:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as per MikeWazowski (with BigDT's recommendation). Bastun 10:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above. TheRealFennShysa 14:58, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.