Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lord Nicholas Hervey

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. This defaults to keep; do not cite it as a reason to support/oppose a merge/redirect/whatever. Johnleemk | Talk 16:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Lord Nicholas Hervey

Moved from speedy as possibly non-notable member of the aristocracy TimPope 11:01, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete. Being rich does not make you instantly notable.Image:Weather rain.pngSoothingR 11:09, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - the most notable thing he ever did was organize a dinner party. Homey 12:53, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn bio. Ruby 14:48, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Question whats the so called "notability" criteria for nobility? I'd have thought being in Burke's Peerage might have swung it personally. Jcuk 16:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep. Don't have time to give the citations right now, but this guy was a member of a notably wacky family. For example, his brother, Lord Bristol, was famed for having blown 7 million pounds on heroin. There is a book about the family, The House of Hervey by Michael De-la-Noy Constable. (ISBN 1841193097). Maybe merge into an article about the family? Crypticfirefly 19:15, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - not notable enough. Latinus 19:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep member of the British aristocracy, all of whom seem to qualify. Was indeed in Burke's, would support a merge to an article on minor Herveys. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 21:59, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep as nobody seems to have an answer to my previous post. Jcuk 23:04, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep, certainly verifiable with no reason to remove information. Ardric47 03:05, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.