Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LooSE TV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:59, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] LooSE TV

LooSE TV (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Student society at the LSE. No evidence of notability. Possibly speedy-able, but there is a discussion at the talk page where some editors defend the page. My vote: delete then redirect (possibly protected) to Nasta. AndyJones 18:05, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete nonnotable club. YechielMan 23:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable club and self promotion, i agree with andy jones plan Sherzo 05:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete young and non-notable student society. No evidence of having made notable productions or won notable prizes. Just having participated in a NASTA confference is no where near sufficient. Ohconfucius 08:23, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

would like to ask abt the double standards on notability with regards to student media. why are student newspapers and radio stations considered notable, but student television not so? even when the exposure which these various media receive is similar. Susoctv 11:17, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • I don't think student newspapers are notable either. AndyJones 13:05, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

How about obscure american high schools? there is a whole list of them, with individual articles. i think this whole notability thing is full of inconsistencies and contradictions. Susoctv 18:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree: the issue of including/excluding schools was hotly debated here at Wikipedia around a year ago. However, that's not an argument for keeping this article, about a subject which isn't notable however you cut it. AndyJones 18:47, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable club. Also WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST isn't a reason to keep the article. Wildthing61476 18:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
    • you should say why this article is notable? Sherzo 21:18, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.