Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest Streets in London

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete as WP:CSD#G4, already deleted by Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest streets in London. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Longest Streets in London

Too trivial Geopgeop 03:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - I'd tend to say that this could turn into an excellent article. Green Lanes is encyclopedic. - Richardcavell 04:07, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. If Green Lanes is the longest street in London, mention it there. Not worthwhile as a seperate article. BryanG^(talk) 04:57, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• There was an afd on an article with this title already (Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Longest_streets_in_London) which was "no consensus", yet it was deleted May 16th. --Jamoche 06:05, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Investigating further, there was Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Longest streets in London (2nd nomination) closed as "delete", followed by a deletion review with the deletion endorsed. The deleting admin simply forgot it was the second nom in his summary. In that case, this can likely be speedy deleted as a repost under WP:CSD#G4. BryanG^(talk) 07:13, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per G4. --Coredesat 07:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above--Smerus 08:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as reposting of deleted material per BryanG. I've tagged it as such. Kevin 09:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.