Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Long Vo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 03:07, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Long Vo

• I may be getting some info from VO himself for this article, i vote Slow Delete --Xexos 01:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)xexos
• Delete. Short and unnecesary. Mercury1 05:57, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• I vote delete just so I can get a chance to call Long short. — JIP | Talk 15:24, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --kingboyk 16:39, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Slow Delete if no more information comes delete it. MAZO 19:51, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. Dustimagic 20:05, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.